Geneva: Gianni Infantino truly looked the "King of Soccer,” as U.S. President Donald Trump likes to call him, as the two allies sat together watching the World Cup final less than two weeks ago.Sure, there were some boos inside MetLife Stadium near New York, when the two men walked across the turf to present the trophy and medals to Spain and Argentina players on July 19.Still, that 104th and final game capped a biggest-ever tournament seen as a vindication for the FIFA president - a consensus success on the field and a financial bonanza for global soccer. Infantino could look ahead to his likely re-election coronation next March.The sunny scene must now feel an age ago since Infantino caused a seismic rift in global soccer.The intensifying fallout might shockingly cost the 56-year-old Infantino a job in which he seemed untouchable until this week.Infantino's misstep was inviting private investors, led by Joshua Kushner, to buy a stake in future profits from World Cups and all FIFA events.The Swiss-Italian official had largely shrugged aside the World Cup's politically motivated incidents that raised criticism and concern in the soccer world: The Iran team and a World Cup referee from Somalia could not stay in the United States, fans were denied entry visas, and soccer’s rule of law was ignored after Trump intervened to let U.S. player Folarin Balogun avoid a mandatory one-game ban.Infantino left New York City last week with letters pledging election support from about 200 of FIFA’s 211 national member federations who vote for their leader every four years.But the most powerful man in soccer, known for always thinking ahead, had a new, huge and secret project in mind.Infantino's proposal would create a subsidiary - known as FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) - for the money-making parts of the not-for-profit soccer body's work: Running tournaments like the World Cup, selling broadcasting and sponsorship, tickets and hospitality.Private equity and petrostate sovereign wealth money has been normalised in European club soccer, yet they still seem unthinkable for many observers in the World Cup - soccer's ultimate prize is about glory, not money, and fans have long believed the World Cup belongs to them.FIFA proposes raising $4.2 billion from investors buying stakes amounting to about 20% in FFE, based on an equity valuation of $20 billion. The "anchor investor” would be Thrive Eternal launched by Joshua Kushner, whose brother Jared Kushner is a son-in-law of Trump.FIFA’s 211 member federations - already effective owners of the governing body as a non-profit association under Swiss law - were offered $20 million each. The deadline to accept is Sept. 19.The members already are due $10 million each from FIFA over the next four years, funded largely by its record $15 billion revenue over 2023-26 tied to the World Cup just ended. FIFA says under FFE, that would double to $20 million each, then rise to $22 million each through 2034, and $24 million to 2038.That’s a huge sum for tiny soccer federations in places like Andorra, Montserrat and Papua New Guinea. Deep-pocketed soccer powers like England, Spain or France have other priorities.Some FIFA vice presidents, some of FIFA’s top executives, all the European soccer federations... the soccer bodies of Asia and North America, Britain’s Prime Minister, the global group of national leagues, a lot of fans worldwide.Infantino was looking increasingly friendless Friday. His senior adviser, former Goldman Sachs banker Carlos Cordeiro, resigned and called it a bad deal. FIFA chief operating officer Kevin Lamour gave a stinging statement to The Associated Press in defence of colleagues that all but invited his boss to fire him.A key move Thursday was European soccer body UEFA vowing to boycott all FIFA competitions until Infantino drops the plan. Europe’s teams routinely dominate and win FIFA trophies like the men’s World Cup and Club World Cup that are its biggest revenue earners.They collectively fear that private investors will seek - and demand - value from more games and bigger competitions that threaten the balance of global soccer. That could jeopardise attention and revenues for club soccer, including the Champions League.Fixture calendars are already congested, elite players are at their limits, broadcast and sponsor money is not unlimited.All are angry that Infantino seems not to have consulted anyone while planning the project over the last year, when he was so focused with spending time in Trump's orbit.U.S. President Donald Trump and FIFA President Gianni Infantino during the trophy presentation after a World Cup match. Picture credit: ReutersInfantino's traditional support base in Africa, which has 54 of the 211 voting members, has been neutral so far about the offers of game-changing money for many of them.The 10-nation South American group CONMEBOL has said nothing so far. It is led by FIFA vice president Alejandro Dominguez of Paraguay, who is relying on Infantino expanding the 2030 World Cup to 64 teams. That would give more games to minority co-hosts Argentina, Paraguay and inaugural 1930 World Cup host Uruguay, who currently are set to get just one game each of the 104. The rest are in Spain, Portugal and Morocco.There is no set FIFA meeting or event scheduled through the end of August.Infantino was on Friday in Morocco, a main ally in soccer politics, for the Women's Africa Cup of Nations.The next FIFA competition is the Women’s Under-20 World Cup starting Sept. 5 in Poland - one the UEFA members say they will boycott.The Sept. 19 deadline for the 211 to accept Infantino's $20 million cash offer is key, though that could quickly be overtaken by events.If the UEFA-led resistance succeeds in stopping the sell-off plan, would it satisfy Infantino's opponents to leave him in office?Does Infantino have the credibility to stay in office after interventions Friday by Lamour and Cordeiro that surely would make most presidencies untenable?Nov. 18 is the deadline for candidates to enter the next presidential contest, exactly four months ahead of the vote in Rabat, Morocco, where FIFA has its African headquarters.Infantino was re-elected unopposed in 2019 in Paris and 2023 in Kigali, Rwanda. FIFA statutes allow him one more four-year term in office. The FFE spinoff has seemed a way to create a commissioner-like role for Infantino beyond 2031, likely paying much more than his current annual salary and bonus deal of more than $6 million.It would take 106 votes to ensure a majority in a contested election. Continents surely do not vote uniformly en bloc, but most of Europe's 55, plus CONCACAF's 35 and Asia's 46 would be a solid base.Speculation on a likely direct challenger typically lands on Paris Saint-Germain's Qatari president Nasser al-Khelaïfi and the Canadian FIFA vice president Victor Montagliani.Such talk seemed fanciful until this week, despite long-term unease with Infantino's style and previous attempts to force through unpopular projects.The talk has never seemed more likely to become action.

Washington: The State Department is making permanent a pilot program under which citizens from 50 countries, mainly in Africa, are required to post bonds to apply for a U.S. visa, and it’s raising the cost as well, to as much as $20,000.A draft notice published Friday in the Federal Register says a nearly year-long review "provided sufficient data” to suggest the bond program effectively enforces compliance with visa conditions, and would be made permanent.The notice is to be formally released on Monday, the day the program becomes permanent, and additional countries may be added to the list, which can be found here. The pilot program set the maximum bond amount at $15,000, with lower amounts of $5,000 and $10,000 based on a consular officer’s discretion. The final regulation raises the maximum to $20,000 and removes the $5,000 low-end payment.The program requires holders of passports from the affected countries to pay the bond to be interviewed for business and tourist visas - known as B1 and B2 visas - to travel to the United States. The bond is refunded if the visa application is denied or, if granted, if the person adheres to the visa terms.The Trump administration rolled out the program last August to crack down on visa overstays and as part of its broader efforts to curtail illegal migration. The government estimates that arresting and deporting visitors who have overstayed their visa costs about $18,000 per person.State Department officials have hailed the program as a great success. In 2024, nearly 45,500 visitors from the 50 countries in the program overstayed their visas, according to the notice. In the first 10 months of the pilot visa bond program, the number of overstays from those countries was fewer than 50, it said.Critics have said it imposes an unnecessarily harsh burden on people from impoverished countries to visit family members or to pursue education or business opportunities in the U.S.According to government projections and statistics from the first year of the program, the State Department initially expected that about 2,000 visa applicants would be required to post the bond. Instead, the department found that roughly 20,000 applicants were covered by the bond requirement.Nearly half of those applicants chose not to pay the bond and there was an 83% decline in the number of business and tourist visas issued to citizens of countries on the list."The department expects that this final rule will contribute to the continued reduction of demand for B1/B2 visa applications from nationals of countries subject to the program,” the notice said.